Sh*t. LOL I never laughed so badly about a thing before in my life! What - a - flame. GEESUS. [SIGHHHHH...] "B. L. Jilek" wrote: > >> >Linux was coded by a buch of clueless moronic twits... They may know how > >> >to tweak out antiquated functions but they can't think BEYOND the > >> >functions to see CONCPTS that have been rotting in neglect since the > >> >'70s.... > >> > >> If your so smart and have been *working* with this for seven years > >> why don't you take the code and fix it? It's readily available and > >> I'm sure the bunch of clueless moronic twits would be glad to learn > >> from you. > >> > >> That's where this OS beats out MS. If someone has ideas like you say > >> you do but I doubt, then you can contribute and help make it better. > > > >Untrue. MS also takes same care of it's software. The problem is that > >the programers keep getting pushed against the walls by the folks > >that're trying to sell the thing. Which would be reduced by a MEGA > >factor if fork like you don't stop brainwashing people into thinking > >that only your pathetic re-invented wheel will work well enough for them > >and not rather something that has been devoloping for years before. > > > > Who the hell cares *why* MS can't get shit done. Who cares if they > do have great programers. I'm sure they do. The point that you fail > to see is that in Linux if someone don't like it, and they have the > skills that this guy said he had, then he could contribute. Can you > do this with MS?? I think not. I guess I'll be taking a job at MS! > >> >Sure you will find better OSes such as Plan 9, and some of the > >> >microkernels, but they only go part-way towards making something that is > >> >just plain BETTER. > >> > > >> >At least Microsoft actually makes pretenses of serving the flaming USER. > >> >I'm not saying that I will ever upgrade windows 3.11 here but at least > >> >you see a genuine effort towards USABILITY that is not to be found > >> >anywhere in linux. > >> > >> Obviously you have only just recently even looked at linux. The leaps > >> and bounds that linux has taken towards USABILITY in the last two years > >> is amazing. > > > >Yup. If your computer survives the install. Figures if it takes 3 hours > >on a 433 MHz comp with a 32x CDD, how long does it take on a 25 MHz comp > >with a 2x CDD? Three weeks? > > > > I've never taken that long to install linux. Ofcourse. My computer must have been caught in an interdimensional time-shift. > And who the hell cares if > it does take that long. Shhhhhhh... > Installing is a one time thing. Unless you > use MS that is. Can't remember to have ever re-installed Windows on my computer. If you can't use the add/remove commands or if the only solution to a mistake is "Format C: /U" to you... Well that's your problem, you can't blame MS for it. > There is no reinstalling in linux to fix screwed up > systems. I'd bet nobody would like to re-install anything like linux. The first thing that comes to mind if something that you've been installing for ***THREE HOURS*** dosen't work, is to trash the installation CD. > So you will have to count all the times that you have to do > thiss reinstall against *one* install of linux. As for reboots, the > same thing goes. I've had slackware on my server for 6 months. One > install, maybe 10 reboots and most of those were from power failures. > How about installing a webserver on your Win95 system and lets see > how they compare. Can you at all? I'm not sure and don't care. How > about that reboot. Not needed here. hmm.. > > You are an idiot. You blame software that can be modified to no end > for your failure to be able to understand it. You compare it to dos, > do you even know how to use dos? Because it's nothing like it. Just > because your too lazy, stupid, keyboard cripled and unable to read > directions you think linux sucks. Just because MS holds your hand > and gives you a cute little start button to make everything ok for > you does not make you a computer expert. > > MS people are lame to think that the speed of the install is a judge > of the OS. Did you ever consider that there are hundreds and sometimes > thousands of aplications being installed allong with the Linux OS? > Are you going to get a web server, ftp server etc installed with > Win95? If you would do a little reading you would see that an entire > linux OS can fit on a single floppy. Idiot. -- Don't feel bad about asking/telling me anything, I will always gladly reply. I'm addicted to QB71. Anybody interested in cooperation? See: Http://www.geocities.com/gtsc4/innc/index.html GTSC4 -- If nobody else wants to do it, why shouldn't we?(TM) HTTP://WWW.GeoCities.COM/GTSC4/