Neil Nelson wrote:

> I sent another $25 check to you as some small encouragement for

> the very good work you have been doing.  Please send me an invoice

> when you get time.



INVOICE



12/21/01



From:

Jure Sah

Gerbiceva 33

1000 Ljubljana

Slovenia

jure.sah@guest.arnes.si



To:

Neil Nelson

333 N. Screenland #323

Burbank, CA 91505

USA

n_nelson@dslextreme.com



Programming work done on ICI Console       $25.00

                                           ------

Amount due 		                   $25.00

----------



> You seemed to be getting into a Society application, and I am looking

> forward to seeing how that works.



The app is called as a function on ICI, then the Console finds it's name

on the list and saves the parameters to the interface file. The app then

reads the file and interprets the parameters it has been sent. The app's

vocabulary curently includes a Message and a Reply (the reply must

contain the text of the thread to tell to what it is replying). The app

can also use the Console's interface file to sent it's messages trough

(so you have to check the "input from PO file" on the Console).



Discussing the previously sent two ideas, I just want to say that the

point is that return form ICI functions can be used by apps. Curently,

the add-on apps are only given commands and are left to return their

results however they want (they can use the Console's interface file and

do additional function calls to deliver the results, for example

function "User" ;). The apps that made the call would then have to ask

the User or another function to tell them what the results were. I'm

trying to fix this... Maybe a "Results" function would do?



--



Don't feel bad about asking/telling me anything, I will always gladly

reply.



Digging for info? Try AI Meta Search:

Http://WWW.AIMetaSearch.Com



MesonAI -- If nobody else wants to do it, why shouldn't we?(TM)

Http://WWW.MesonAI.Com

